AI Detection Report

Robotically consistent typing speed

The document was entered at a mechanically uniform speed of 68-72 WPM that remained virtually unchanged across the entire 1,420-word essay, regardless of content complexity. Even during complex literary analysis of Macbeth's soliloquies, typing speed maintained precisely 70 ± 2 WPM. This robotic consistency contrasts sharply with human writing, which typically shows 15-30% speed variation as cognitive load fluctuates with content difficulty.

Complete absence of cognitive pauses

The document was entered without a single significant pause from start to finish. Our system detected no cognitive pauses longer than 0.8 seconds across the entire document—even between complex paragraphs discussing philosophical themes in Macbeth. For comparison, human writers typically demonstrate 3-6 second pauses between complex sentences and 10-30 second pauses between paragraphs while organizing thoughts.

Zero substantive editing activity

The essay was entered with virtually no editing whatsoever. Our system detected only 4 single-character deletions for immediate typo correction, with an editing rate of just 0.3% (compared to the 12-18% typical of human student writing). At no point did the cursor move backward to revise earlier content, no sentences were rewritten, and no structural changes were made—behaviors universally present in authentic human composition.

Perfect grammar and syntax

The document contains flawless grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure throughout, with no natural variations or errors typical in human writing. This level of perfection is characteristic of large language model output rather than authentic student work.

Unnatural vocabulary consistency

Vocabulary analysis shows a consistent FK grade level of 12.3 throughout the document, with minimal standard deviation (±0.2). Human writing typically shows greater variation (±1.5-2.0) as complexity of thought changes throughout a document.

Strong statistical match to AI patterns

The text shows a 96% match with known AI language model patterns across all sections, including sentence structure, transition phrases, and semantic embeddings. This strongly indicates generation by a large language model.

Formulaic paragraph structure

Each paragraph follows an identical structural pattern: topic sentence, evidence, analysis, and conclusion. This level of structural consistency is uncharacteristic of authentic student writing, which typically shows more natural variation in paragraph organization.

Generic analysis lacking specificity

While the essay contains factually correct information about Macbeth, the analysis remains general and predictable, lacking the unique insights or perspectives typically found in authentic student work. The essay reads like a compilation of common observations about the play.

Inconsistent with student's established voice

Comparison with Michael's previous submissions shows only 8% alignment with his established writing patterns, vocabulary preferences, and analytical approach. This significant departure from his usual style strongly suggests the content was not authored by him.